What are the premises in the following argument on public schools?
What is the conclusion?
How do you remove emotive language and rhetorical questions from the argument?
Are there any logical fallacies (fault in reasoning)?
Here is the argument in its original form. “Lack of money is not the problem with public schools.
Just the opposite: the more they get, the worse they become.
The Left keeps wanting more money for schools.
Conservatives are considered to be against education.
However, since the horrible schools in Washington, D.C. receive 2.8 times as much money per student as California schools, it is reasonable to believe that matching that level would also drop performance to that level. Ugh.
The teacher’s unions and the bureaucrats have created the current mess, and the only way out is to privatize all California schools.
It is a simple choice: do we care more about children or about unions and bureaucracy?”
Introducing our Online Essay Writing Services Agency, where you can confidently place orders for a wide range of academic assignments. Our reputable homework writing company specializes in crafting essays, term papers, research papers, capstone projects, movie reviews, presentations, annotated bibliographies, reaction papers, research proposals, discussions, and various other assignments. Rest assured, our content is guaranteed to be 100% original, as every piece is meticulously written from scratch. Say goodbye to concerns about plagiarism and trust us to deliver authentic and high-quality work.
WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Get Help Now!