UG Assessment & Grading Criteria for UHBS Coursework

UG Assessment & Grading Criteria for UHBS Coursework
Module Code:_ Student – ID no: ________________________ Mark:_________________

UG Assessment & Grading Criteria for UHBS Coursework Structure and presentation Use and presentation of
Harvard Referencing Content Breadth / Depth / Integration of Research Analysis /Critical evaluation/
Discussion

WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

80-100

Outstanding
Presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style.
No grammatical / spelling errors.
Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.

Exploration of topic showing excellent knowledge & understanding through thorough & appropriate research.
Impressive choice and range of appropriate content.
Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work.

Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation.
Highly developed/ focused work which shows originality and independent thinking.

70-79

Excellent
Presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style.
Only minor errors.
Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.
Level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated.
Evidence of appropriate reading.
Covers all relevant points & issues.
Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work.
Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation, clearly developing points in the appropriate way with thorough consideration of all possibilities.

60-69

Very Good
Presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Fluent academic writing style.
Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes.
Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.
Level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated.
Covers most relevant points & issues.
Few errors / omissions in content.
Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work.

Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation. A few ideas/points could benefit from further development &/or evaluation/comparison.

50-59

Good
Clear presentation & essay structure with paragraphing.
Writing is mainly clear but some spelling &/ or grammatical errors.
Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references & mainly consistent with Reference list.
Grasp of the topic & some of its implications presented.
Knowledge & understanding is demonstrated.
Minor errors / omissions in content.
Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work.
Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation but more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.

40-49

Satisfactory
Basic essay structure.
Not always written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling errors.
Basic referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references and Reference list, but some inconsistencies.
Content / level of knowledge of the topic. Addresses part of the task. Some errors / omissions in content.
May benefit from further research.
Business insight & application. Limited integration with literature/ data.
Use of literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth.
Basic evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation, but some points superficially made so need further development.

30-39

Marginal Fail
Weak… Essay format, limited or poor structure.
Muddled work with many spelling & / or grammatical errors.
Weak… Use of Harvard referencing system with errors & inconsistently applied. Limited referencing within the text. Limited accuracy of in-text references and in the Reference list.
Weak… Limited content / knowledge. Limited or muddled understanding of the topic/question.
Does not meet all the learning outcomes.
Weak… Unsatisfactory evidence of business application & insight
Work needs to show better links between practical application & theory.

Weak… Limited evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation.
More development & comment needed. May need to do more than describe.

15 – 29

Clear Fail
Inadequate essay format & poor paragraphing. Inappropriate writing style.
Poorly written &/or poor spelling & grammar. Must see ASU
Inadequate use of Harvard referencing with many errors &/or inconsistencies.

Must see ASU
Lacking in relevant content/ knowledge. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.
Lacks evidence of business application & insight. Some literature irrelevant to topic.
Lacking / inadequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation. Descriptive.

Must see ASU

1 – 14

Little or Nothing of merit
Poorly written work, lacking structure, paragraphing.
Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar.
Must see ASU
No or little attempt to use the recommended Harvard referencing system.

Must see ASU
Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated.
Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes.
No evidence of appropriate business application & insight.

Unsatisfactory level of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation.

Must see ASU