Section 1: INTRO: 3 marks

Section 1: INTRO: 3 marks

·The breath of the intro; this should be a broad overview, with

·references.

·A brief introduction to “your case study” based immune system is

OK (couple of

·sentences), but also need to add an extensive discussion of

·T cells, B cells, innate immunity etc.

·The depth of the examples

·No errors in understanding

I did not received these topics these are just examples which shows what I write my

Those who got immune therapy topic as an assignment example

HIV vaccine development/immune therapy:

Should mention different types of immunotherapy, ie: passive, with

antibodies, active, eg vaccination, cytokine therapy etc.

·What are the reasons for using immunotherapy?

·What are the major targets etc?

Those who received infection or allergy or transplantation or

cancer example

The primary literature should be comprehensive and tell us about

stage of infection, cellular and humoral immune responses and

how the therapy was used and why it works

My topic is HIV diagnostic tests

Section 2: Demonstration of Understanding of Immunological

Principles (7 out of 10)

·Must be convinced that the student understands the underlying

·principles, as judged by

·Content should demonstrate relevance and originality

·Understanding/explanation of professional focus.

·Imaginative, creative and accurate use of facts and theories to

support arguments.

·Ability to critically analyse situations using different perspectives.

Section 3: Presentation/Logic/Flow of Report (2 out of 10)

·Interpret brief correctly.

·Evidence of being able to examine and evaluate critically

·using appropriate theoretical frameworks.

·Points raised reapplied and fully integrated into the

·discussion.

·Should be well laid out, divided into sections,Language should be

scientific, no jargon.

·Small deduction if grammar poor.

·If have figures, must be appropriate and attributed

Section 4: References (3 out of 10)

·Have correct referencing (Do not refer your preferred TEXT

·BOOK–Kuby immunology);

·The more recent the better

·Demonstrates clear ability to present arguments with perception

and insight related to experience and relevant research/literature.

·Selective and creative use of research and literature to illuminate

and support the issues addressed