After reading 5 articles, you have to make summary, discussion question, and answer for that targeting to the students who already finished reading.

After reading 5 articles, you have to make summary, discussion question, and answer for that targeting to the students who already finished reading.

This assignment is vastly percentage on the total grade (90%) which means “do it your best” and “no mistake on the context.”

WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

I could check whether it is suitable or not since I already finished reading several times.

You have to analyze 5 articles I gave you critically.

I will give you a guideline below.

Please do not do in a wrong way.

Most structural you have to do is followed by three steps for each five articles.

You have to do all three requirement for each five articles then I will ask more additional requirement by indicating additional requirement for each articles.

This is common three requirements for each five articles.

1)

Make a further research from what you think is interesting. (The contexts should not be come from the article. It should be related. But it should be similar in the different context.) The different context should be found in your own based on other materials by giving citation.

The ideas on the research should be new to the students who already finished reading. (Do not make the idea which the students can answer easily once the students finished reading.)

The different context should be applied the context the article explain.

(1parahraph)

2)

Make a discussion question to the students who already finished reading. Make a question from your insight or other relating different ways. The question should be new interesting ideas and creative one to the students who already finished reading.

(3 sentences)

For the second discussion question, I will give you sample from other student.

You can only look at third paragraph from other students.

<Other person’s work for different article>

In the paper, the author summarized previous meta-analysis results as a way to celebrate the new millennium. However, almost 15-years has been past and many new related researchers have been published. It does not cover as much as what we now know.For example, a recent study by Oh, Lee.Ashon, and de Vries (2011) examined an interacting relationship of extroverted and honesty. Many other scholars also investigated HEXACO model combined with FFM (e.g. Lee, Ashon, Ogunfowora, Bourdaga, & Shin, 2010; Ashton & Lee, 2005;Hillbig, Zettler, Leist. &Heydasch, 2013).Plus we all know that a person has a multiple set of personalities. Therefore, simply replying on each aspect of FFM is exposed to many limitations.

Bidwell(2011), his hypotheses were simple at first sight, but the data collection seemed to be the strong point of the paper. The paper would have been more interesting if the author provided practical implication because the findings demonstrated that new hires receive higher pay but face a higher risk of termination. Studying the underlying mechanism of the firm’s behavior will be very meaningful. In my opinion, it may depend on a firm’s characteristic, for example, this paper’s data is from investment firms which is symbolized to take a risk while values specific skills. Therefore, if the same study was taken in a different context, different results will be expected. Also, thinking of micro – level scope, employees’ orientation may explain why external hires are more attractive to them. Pay may be one reason for switching jobs,but enjoying a challenge can also explain why some workers stay in the same firm (internal mobility) and others do not.