Personality (traits, motives) beliefs and identity in the study of individuals

Personality (traits, motives) beliefs and identity in the study of individuals

Personality is an individual’s pattern of feeling, behavior and thought that are incorporated in the psychological mechanisms. The practice of personality is based on two areas. First, it involves understanding individuals’ irritability and sociability. Secondly, it promotes understanding the holistic person. Therefore psychologists are mandated to perform distinct responsibilities depending o their area of specialization.

WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

According to research, personality, beliefs and identity are pivotal in studying and drawing a viable study on human behavior. Two interdependent principles, that is, cognitive principle (accessibility) and motivational (regulatory) principle are pivotal to illustrate conceptual personality.  The process involves cross-person variability while conducting the entire psychological practice with situational foundation. The two principles present evidence -based on environmental factors that situations and persons create variability in the same manner.

Therefore, there are distinct grounds under which personality may be based. At one edge, personality provides explanation for people’s behaviors. On the other hand, some areas of psychology have a different objective and psychological explanations (for example, in social psychology). In order for personality and identity to have its own unique purpose it has to develop its own principles. These principles include achievement motives and personal construct. The principles are fundamental to explain the people’s psychological state. Historical principles of personality, beliefs and identity supported unique situational findings. On the other hand, the current principles tend to explain personality in terms of social relationship. Social psychological principles include obedience to authority and cognitive dissonance. Therefore, there is no commonality in determining human behavior in the two perspectives. What creates a deviation is how behavioral situations have been analyzed.

In order to conduct a viable cross-situational analysis of persons’, the recognized personality dimensions and aspects are used to manage or remove the impact of situations on behavior. Based on psychoanalytic emphasize the aspect is aimed to structure the interacting personality aspect. These aspects include traits, conflicts and defenses that a person posses. Socialization perspectives and situation aspects are changed into negative fixation at early stages of personality examination. The two perspectives cause personality, belief and identity to deviate from each other significantly. However, they predict human behavior by using the ‘person’ principles.

For example, assume that a psychologist analyzed the psychological behavior of a large sample involved in various activities. Depending on the information needed by the researcher, variation would emanate from such needs. For instance, Personality psychologists might determine how the psychological behaviors vary across individuals. On the other hand, social psychologists might be interested to investigate the variations across situations. Cultural psychologists might be interested to investigate on how the psychological behavior varies across ethnic segments.