Do not cut and paste large sections of Wikipedia pages together to create a paper. This is plagiarism. Please aquatint yourself with the consequences thereof. You need to remove all Wikipedia material from this paper, create a central argument that you can defend and support, and use databases from the library to find peer-reviewed resources. Use the “Ask a librarian” feature for help with research and submit to the online writing center for help with organization and proofreading. Do not surf the internet or use Wikipedia under any circumstances.
WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Get Help Now!
| Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction: Overview |
Points: 13.5 (10%)
Provides an overview of the issue being analyzed and briefly describes main points of argument
|
Points: 10.13 (7.5%)
Provides an overview of the issue being analyzed and briefly describes main points of argument but contains issues regarding accuracy
Feedback: This should be a persuasive paper, not an informative paper on the state of road planning and construction
|
Points: 0 (0%)
Does not provide an overview of the issue being analyzed
|
| Introduction: Thesis |
Points: 13.5 (10%)
Composes a thesis that states the argument that will be supported and proven throughout the essay
|
Points: 10.13 (7.5%)
Composes a thesis but contains issues related to clarity or relevancy
|
Points: 0 (0%)
Does not compose a thesis
Feedback: There doesn’t seem to be an arguable thesis.
|
| Body: Intent |
Points: 13.5 (10%)
Writes multiple paragraphs that are focused, clearly state their intent, and build the thesis argument
|
Points: 10.13 (7.5%)
Writes multiple paragraphs but writing does not build the thesis argument
Feedback: Very few of the paragraphs are your own–most of this paper is a direct cut and paste from various and uncredited Wikipedia sites. This constitutes plagiarism. Please see the announcement at the beginning of the course concerning plagiarism and the consequences thereof.
|
Points: 0 (0%)
Does not write multiple paragraphs
|
| Body: Body Paragraphs |
Points: 40.5 (30%)
Body paragraphs communicate argument by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence
|
Points: 30.38 (22.5%)
Body paragraphs communicate argument but do not combine thoughts and ideas with evidence
Feedback: There are a few credited sources used throughout, though they aren’t clearly connected to any argument. See the following for ways to compile a persuasive essay:
|
Points: 0 (0%)
Does not communicate argument through body paragraphs
|
| Body: Opposing Viewpoints |
Points: 13.5 (10%)
Addresses and refutes opposing viewpoints in a way that strengthens the argument
|
Points: 10.13 (7.5%)
Addresses and refutes opposing viewpoints but not in a way that strengthens the argument
Feedback: These really aren’t counterarguments to any specific argument built within the paper, though there are some sources credited.
|
Points: 0 (0%)
Does not address or refute opposing viewpoints
|
| Conclusion: Review |
Points: 13.5 (10%)
Reviews claim and summarizes key supporting points of essay
|
Points: 10.13 (7.5%)
Reviews claim and summarizes key supporting points but contains issues regarding alignment to the intent of the thesis
|
Points: 0 (0%)
Does not review claim
Feedback: Adding several more paragraphs from Wikipedia doesn’t constitute a summation of your main points.
|
| Conclusion: Insights |
Points: 13.5 (10%)
Articulates insights about argument established through the analysis, following argument logically, referring to key points or quotes used to support argument
|
Points: 10.13 (7.5%)
Articulates insights about argument established through the essay, but does not follow argument logically or does not refer to key points or quotes used to support claim
|
Points: 0 (0%)
Does not articulate insights about argument
Feedback: There needs to be insight to the argument given here as well as an emphasis on concluding evidence.
|
| Articulation of Response |
Points: 13.5 (10%)
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
|
Points: 10.13 (7.5%)
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Feedback: Format according to APA standards. You need to proofread the text that is your own for usage (their/there), fragments, and agreement.
|
Introducing our Online Essay Writing Services Agency, where you can confidently place orders for a wide range of academic assignments. Our reputable homework writing company specializes in crafting essays, term papers, research papers, capstone projects, movie reviews, presentations, annotated bibliographies, reaction papers, research proposals, discussions, and various other assignments. Rest assured, our content is guaranteed to be 100% original, as every piece is meticulously written from scratch. Say goodbye to concerns about plagiarism and trust us to deliver authentic and high-quality work.
WRITE MY ESSAY NOW
