MGT300 Portfolio Project Rubric

MGT300 Portfolio Project

MGT300 Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Meets Expectation
Approaches Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
17-20 Points
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
5-8 Points
Preliminary Deliverables
Delivered interview subject and summary of theories in Week 2 per specifications.
Delivered interview subject and summary of theories in Week 2 with a significant omission or error.
Delivered interview subject and summary of theories in Week 2 with one or more major omissions or errors.
Did not deliver interview subject and summary of theories in Week 2.
17-20 Points
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
5-8 Points
Preliminary Deliverables
Delivered outline in Week 5 per specifications.
Delivered outline in Week 5 with a significant omission or error.
Delivered outline in Week 5 with one or more major omissions or errors.
Did not deliver outline in Week 5.
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Requirements
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
29-35 Points
22-28 Points
15-21 Points
8-14 Points
Content
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of important management topics, including but not limited to leadership, personality, motivation, decision-making, communication, and the importance of good management to oneself and to society; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
37-45 Points
28-36 Points
19-27 Points
10-18 Points
Interview
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of information gained in interview.
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
45-55 Points
34-44 Points
23-33 Points
12-22 Points
Synthesis
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis of course concepts in integrating important management topics with information gained from both personal experience and interview.
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
MGT300: Portfolio Project Rubric
33-40 Points
25-32 Points
17-24 Points
9-16 Points
Reflection
Demonstrates strong or adequate personal insight and reflection regarding the knowledge gained in this course and its relevance to one’s professional, personal, and community life.
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of personal insight and reflection.
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of personal insight and reflection.
Fails to demonstrate personal insight and reflection.
17-20 Points
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
5-8 Points
Career Development Criteria
Includes all of the required components of the Career Development Criteria, as specified in the assignment.
Practitioner Experience
1. Evaluate internships or volunteer opportunities.
2. Degree field certifications and personal and career evaluation.
Includes most of the required components of the Career Development Criteria, as specified in the assignment.
Includes some of the required components of the Career Development Criteria, as specified in the assignment.
Includes few of the required components of the Career Development Criteria, as specified in the assignment.
13-15 Points
10-12 Points
7-9 Points
4-6 Points
Sources
Cites and integrates at least three credible sources.
Cites and integrates two credible sources.
Cites and integrates one credible source.
Cites and integrates no credible sources.
13-15 Points
10-12 Points
7-9 Points
4-6 Points
Application of Source Material
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
Mechanics and Writing
17-20 Points
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
5-8 Points
Organization
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.
MGT300: Portfolio Project Rubric
17-20 Points
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
5-8 Points
Grammar and Style
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
17-20 Points
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
5-8 Points
APA
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.
Total points possible = 350

WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!