EPAS 2.1.3:Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments

EPAS 2.1.3:Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments
Criteria 18-20 Points
Capstone (A) 16-17 Points
Benchmark (B) 14-15 Points
Emerging Skill (C) 0-13 Points
Not Competent (D/F) Scoring
APA:
-Title page (2 pts.),
-Running head (2 pts.)
-Page numbers (2 pts.)
-Reference page (4 pts.)
-In text citations (4 pts.)
-Page headings (2 pts.),
-Font (12 pt. Times New Roman) (2pts.)
-Margins and spacing (2 pts.). Successfully demonstrates mastery of 18-20 points of the criteria. Successfully demonstrates 16-17 points of the criteria. Demonstrates only 14-15 points of the criteria. Did not meet criteria. (13 and below)
Criteria 18-20 Points
Capstone (A) 16-17 Points
Benchmark (B) 14-15 Points
Emerging Skill (C) 0-13 Points
Not Competent (D/F) Scoring
Mechanics:
-Spelling (4 pts.)
-Grammar (4 pts.)
-Word usage (2 pts.)
-Page length requirements (3 pts.)
-Sentence structure (2 pts.)
-Punctuation (2 pts.)
-Appropriate sources (3 pts.) Successfully demonstrates mastery of 18-20 points of the criteria. Successfully demonstrates 16-17 points of the criteria. Demonstrates only 14-15 points of the criteria. Did not meet criteria. (13 and below)
Criteria 45-50 Points
Capstone (A) 40-44.5 Points
Benchmark (B) 35-39.5 Points
Emerging Skill (C) 0-34.5 Points
Not Competent (D/F) Scoring
EPAS 2.1.3
Practice Behavior a:
Social workers distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom. Student demonstrates an advanced ability
1. Student thoroughly describes two treatment models, and includesthorough information about the evidence that supports the use of the model to assist clients with problems. (45-50 pts.) Student demonstrates a foundational ability
1. Student describes two treatment models, and includes information about the evidence that supports the use of the model to assist clients with problems. (40-44.5 pts.)
Student demonstrates an emerging ability
1. Student describes two treatment models, though the description is brief or lacking detail, and the student includessome information about the evidence that supports the use of the model to assist clients with problems, though sources may not be current or scholarly. (35-39.5 pts.) Student demonstrates a deficient ability
1. Student does poorly at describingtreatment modelsOR only describes one treatment model OR evidence that supports the use of the model is not provided or not scholarly or very outdated. (0-34.5 pts.)
Criteria 72-80 Points
Capstone (A) 64-71.5 Points
Benchmark (B) 58-63.5 Points
Emerging Skill (C) 0-57 Points
Not Competent (D/F) Scoring
EPAS 2.1.3
Practice Behavior b:
Social workers analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation.
Student demonstrates an advanced ability
1. Studentprovides a thorough comparison of the two models, including strengths, criticisms, and potential weaknesses of the models. Comparison is complete, reasoned, and thorough. (18-20pts.)
2. Student provides a thorough description and comparison of the role of the social worker using each model. Comparison is complete, reasoned, and thorough. (18-20pts.)
3. Student provides a thoughtful comparison of the perspective of the human condition and the approach for problem solving used in each model. Comparison is complete, reasoned, and thorough. (18-20pts.)
4. Student provides a thoughtful comparison of how tasks for improving the client’s problems are assigned or completed. Comparison is complete, reasoned, and thorough. (18-20pts.) Student demonstrates a foundational ability
1. Student provides a comparison of the two models, including strengths, criticisms, and potential weaknesses of the models. Comparison is mostly complete, reasoned, and thorough. (16-17.75pts.)
2. Student provides a description and comparison of the role of the social worker using each model. Comparison is mostly complete, reasoned, and thorough. (16-17.75pts.)
3. Student provides a comparison of the perspective of the human condition and the approach for problem solving used in each model. Comparison is mostly complete, reasoned, and thorough. (16-17.75pts.)
4. Student provides a comparison of how tasks for improving the client’s problems are assigned or completed. Comparison is mostly complete, reasoned, and thorough. (16-17.75pts.) Student demonstrates an emerging ability
1. Student provides a comparison of the two models, including strengths, criticisms, and potential weaknesses of the models. Comparison is somewhat complete, reasoned, and thorough. (14.5-15.75pts.)
2. Student provides a description and comparison of the role of the social worker using each model. Comparison is somewhat complete, reasoned, and thorough. (14.5-15.75pts.)
3. Student provides a comparison of the perspective of the human condition and the approach for problem solving used in each model. Comparison is somewhat complete, reasoned, and thorough. (14.5-15.75pts.)
4. Student provides a comparison of how tasks for improving the client’s problems are assigned or completed. Comparison is somewhat complete, reasoned, and thorough. (14.5-15.75pts.) Student demonstrates a deficient ability
1. Comparison of the models’ strengths, criticisms, and weaknesses is incomplete, not well reasoned, or is not thorough. (0-14.25pts.)
2. Comparison of the role of the social worker using each model is incomplete, not well reasoned, or is not thorough. (0-14.25pts.)
3. Comparison of the perspective of the human condition and the approach for problem solving used in each model is incomplete, not well reasoned, or is not thorough. (0-14.25pts.)
4. Comparison of how tasks for improving the client’s problems are assigned or completed is incomplete, not well reasoned, or is not thorough. (0-14.25pts.)
Criteria 27-30 Points
Capstone (A) 24-26.5 Points
Benchmark (B) 21-23.5 Points
Emerging Skill (C) 0-20 Points
Not Competent (D/F) Scoring
EPAS 2.1.3
Practice Behavior c:
Social workers demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues.
Student demonstrates an advanced ability
1. Studenteffectively communicates a preference for a perspective/model/mode of treatment that is based on information learned through this assignment. (27-30 pts.)
Student demonstrates a foundational ability
1. Student does a relatively good job in communicating a preference for a perspective/model/mode of treatment that is based on information learned through this assignment. (24-26.5 pts.)
Student demonstrates an emerging ability
1. 1. Student communicates a preference for a perspective/model/mode of treatment that is based on information learned through this assignment; however the description is not clear or misses key information. (21-23.5 pts.) Student demonstrates a deficient ability
1. Student does not provides an adequate description of apreference for a perspective/model/mode of treatment OR the description is not based on information learned through this assignment. (0-20 pts.)

Total: 200 Points

WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!