Benchmark Developmental Disabilities: Best Practices and Support
Benchmark Developmental Disabilities: Best Practices and Support – Reading homework help
WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Get Help Now!Plagiarism Free, Prepare this assignment APA Style. Abstract is not required.
Need back on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @ 6:00pm Central time
In 650 words use the list below, select one of the common approaches mental health professionals use to support individuals living with a developmental disability.
Provide a brief historical background of the development of that treatment approach.
- Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA)
- Family therapy and support groups
- Pivotal Response Training (PRT)
- Discrete Trial Training (DTT)
Note: This assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:
4.1: Determine coping approaches for various mental health crisis situations.
Please read Rubric attachment very important
Attachments
| 25.0 %Explain the effects of anxiety on the body, mind, and spirit of an individual. | The explanation of how anxiety affects the body, mind, and spirit is missing. | The explanation of how anxiety affects the body, mind, and spirit is not evenly focused on each and lacks meaningful details. | The explanation of how anxiety affects the the body, mind, and spirit focuses on each evenly with clear details about each. | The explanation of how anxiety affects the body, mind, and spirit focuses on each evenly with specific examples and draws connections between each of the parts of an individual. | The explanation of how anxiety affects the the body, mind, and spirit focuses on each evenly and emphasizes the relationships between each of the parts of an individual. | ||||||||||||
| 45.0 %Compare two anxiety assessment tools and how they may be selected for use by professionals. | There is no comparison of two anxiety assessment tools or explanation for why a mental health professional would select either of them. | The comparison of two anxiety assessment tools includes minimal details about the similarities and differences between the form and functions of each assessment tool. The explanation for why a mental health professional may select one over the other is lacking. | The comparison of two anxiety assessment tools includes similarities and differences between the form and functions of each. There is explanation for why a mental health professional may select one over the other in based on contexts. | The comparison of two anxiety assessment tools evaluates similarities and differences between the form and functions of each. There is explanation for why a mental health professional may select one over the other in different contexts. | The comparison of two anxiety assessment tools evaluates similarities and differences between the form and functions of each. There is explanation for why a mental health professional may select one over the other in multiple, varying contexts. | ||||||||||||
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | |||||||||||||||||
| 7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||||||||||||
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||||||||||||
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic Eng | ||||||||||||
| Format | |||||||||||||||||
| 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||||||||||||
| 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||||||||||||
Introducing our Online Essay Writing Services Agency, where you can confidently place orders for a wide range of academic assignments. Our reputable homework writing company specializes in crafting essays, term papers, research papers, capstone projects, movie reviews, presentations, annotated bibliographies, reaction papers, research proposals, discussions, and various other assignments. Rest assured, our content is guaranteed to be 100% original, as every piece is meticulously written from scratch. Say goodbye to concerns about plagiarism and trust us to deliver authentic and high-quality work.
WRITE MY ESSAY NOW
