How conformity is used in terrorist groups

How conformity is used in terrorist groups

The terrorists groups determine limits of their rational action and individual psychological attributes. Research in group and organization psychology by Blanco et al., 2004 unveils critical knowledge. Therefore, there are two types of terrorist organization attributes and conformities that guide their operations. The first group deals with the organizational structure, while the other one relates to group dynamics.

WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

The management structure of a group may be equivalent to a formal social relations established by formal members. Taking into account certain norms and roles. There are two common systems of terrorist groups that support uniformity. The first structure involves a hierarchical system which IRA can be based on including the Italian Red Brigades. The other structure is flexible and operations are decentralized hence less hierarchical. The flexible structure corresponds to terrorist needs. The system has multiple activities which operate autonomously. Examples include the jihadist networks, Hamas, and Hezbollah which conducts their operations in different parts of the world. A well structured hierarchical structure enhances firm control and leadership to support conformity. The conformity ensures compliance to the group’s operational protocol. Group’s instructions emanate from the top management of the organization.

On the other hand, it is difficult to dismantle hierarchical systems. The difficult arise from strong bond between the group’s networks. Therefore, irreparable harm may not emanate from neutralization of some networks. According to Ronfeldt findings, many terrorists groups have embraced flexible organizational structures. Conformity is also used while making tactical and strategic transnational demands of terrorism campaigns. Compliance to the group’s rule and regulations creates uniformity across all militia networks.

Decision making process inside terrorist’s organizations creates dynamism. The decision making process is a key role involved in attaining major operational decisions. Most studies reveal that human groups polarize both decisions and attitudes at an amazing rate than individuals. The group polarization may promote/initiate risky operations.

Terrorist networks show uniformity towards the application of group’s regulations which promote group conformity. For example, terrorists reduce drastically the social interaction with people who are against their extremist ideology. Terrorists are also subjected to strong disciplinary action for non compliance.

Other group perspectives that promote conformity

• The roles and norms  which group leaders apply to adjust behavior
• The impact exerted by terrorists leaders;
• The psychological benefits and material rewards given by the terrorist’s militancy.

In conclusion, research on persuasion, social influe