Dissociative Identity Disorder: Medicolegal Challenges

Dissociative Identity Disorder: Medicolegal Challenges

Dissociative Identity Disorder refers to conditions that interfere with an individual’s distinct identities and personality. The disorder was first discovered in 1646 by Paracelsus. Later, advanced researches have assisted to discover new DID symptoms. These conditions are severe and cause the breakdown of consciousness, memory and perception. Therefore, it is characterized by the presence of multiple personalities. The dissociative condition has raised many controversies in legal cases (Farrell, 2011). From the legal perspective, the court decision may be affected by the DID complexities. The controversy arise on whether alters provides an acquittal for mental illness. The critique tends to look at the significance of the article, findings, strengths and weaknesses. The paper also looks at the importance of the article to my colleagues.

WRITE THIS ESSAY FOR ME

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

The article under review by Farrell is critical in the study of mental health nursing. The article comprehensively covers critical area such as the history of DID, forensic evaluation, causes and pathology. The article further guides nurses on DID controversies by quoting various court rulings. The practitioners are furnished with knowledge related to diagnosis tools such as DSM-IV-TR (Farrell, 2011). Lastly, the article highlights key dissociates symptoms.  Importance of the article’s information in my practice

The critique considers that in-depth study of the DID is bestowed upon the field of neurobiology (to enhance neuropsychological studies). The article is important in my practice because it provide DID causes and pathology. The article clarifies that disorders that characterize DID are based on identity fragmentation instead of separate personalities proliferation. The article puts forth the importance of DSM-IV-TR, experiences Scale, Malingered Symptomatology and the interview schedule.

The article advocates for the use of legal approaches for NGRI experiencing multiple personalities (Farrell, 2011). For instance, the court might adjudicate the defendant as s result of malingered personalities. Therefore, the article equips practitioners with skills needed to understand how astute defense handles cases with multiple personalities. I will be able to understand that disturbances arise from individual’s perception rather than direct psychological impacts of mental state.

The article also acknowledges that dissociation creates controversies in the diagnosis process. Therefore, the article calls for clinical research and advancement in the study of DID diagnosis and treatment. It also advocates for court independent. For instance, the ruling in the case of State v. Jones revealed that the malingered symptoms could not impact the court ruling.

Whether to recommend the article to a colleague

The article plays an important role to promote the current studies on the DID contemporary issues. Therefore, I would advise my co…………………………………………